<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek4Eva &#187; SDLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/tag/sdlc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog</link>
	<description>No Limits - Farid Vaswani, Software Testing, Ismailis, Gadgets, IT News and all the other Geeky blabbering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 00:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The New QA Process</title>
		<link>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/11/03/the-new-qa-process/</link>
		<comments>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/11/03/the-new-qa-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farid Vaswani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been numerous debates on the topic of Testing v/s Quality Assurance (QA). Like: QA has bigger scope than testing, testing is more effective, QA helps find issues earlier, etc. As per my understanding the commonly accepted argument is that &#8216;testing&#8217; is something that comes at the end of the SDLC. It is the [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/06/what-is-your-testers-attitude/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: What is Your Tester&#8217;s Attitude?'>What is Your Tester&#8217;s Attitude?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/28/test-automation-and-roi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Test Automation and ROI'>Test Automation and ROI</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/25/behaviour-driven-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Behaviour-Driven Development'>Behaviour-Driven Development</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/11/03/the-new-qa-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Direct Cost of Test Driven Development</title>
		<link>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/10/04/direct-cost-of-test-driven-development/</link>
		<comments>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/10/04/direct-cost-of-test-driven-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farid Vaswani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#8217;t really had a first-hand experience of Test Driven Development, though have come across some real promoters of it. The two most common push back that I hear from developers or their managers for not being able to implement this are: 1 &#8211; It takes a while to implement as in training developers and them [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/29/different-flavours-of-waterfall-and-agile-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Different Flavours of Waterfall and Agile Development'>Different Flavours of Waterfall and Agile Development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/28/test-automation-and-roi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Test Automation and ROI'>Test Automation and ROI</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/25/behaviour-driven-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Behaviour-Driven Development'>Behaviour-Driven Development</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/10/04/direct-cost-of-test-driven-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different Flavours of Waterfall and Agile Development</title>
		<link>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/29/different-flavours-of-waterfall-and-agile-development/</link>
		<comments>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/29/different-flavours-of-waterfall-and-agile-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farid Vaswani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a quick and simple overview of the main differences between Waterfall Development, Iterative Waterfall Development, Scrum/Agile Development and Lean by Agile101.net Waterfall Development ‘Waterfall Development’ is another name for the more traditional approach to software development. It’s called ‘waterfall’ as this type of development is often planned using a Gantt chart – you complete [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/10/04/direct-cost-of-test-driven-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Direct Cost of Test Driven Development'>Direct Cost of Test Driven Development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/20/compromising-user-acceptance-testing/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Compromising User Acceptance Testing'>Compromising User Acceptance Testing</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/25/behaviour-driven-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Behaviour-Driven Development'>Behaviour-Driven Development</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/29/different-flavours-of-waterfall-and-agile-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Your Project&#8217;s Sweet Spot?</title>
		<link>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/05/what-is-your-projects-sweet-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/05/what-is-your-projects-sweet-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farid Vaswani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing approach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am currently working on a relatively long project and after 6 weeks into it I had found my sweet spot for the project. Image Source &#160; Sweet Spot? What exactly is &#8216;Sweet Spot&#8216;? &#160; Steven DeMaio in his blog &#8211; How to Find Your Project&#8217;s Sweet Spot helps us to identify when is the [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/29/different-flavours-of-waterfall-and-agile-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Different Flavours of Waterfall and Agile Development'>Different Flavours of Waterfall and Agile Development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/25/behaviour-driven-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Behaviour-Driven Development'>Behaviour-Driven Development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/11/03/the-new-qa-process/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The New QA Process'>The New QA Process</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/05/what-is-your-projects-sweet-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test Automation and ROI</title>
		<link>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/28/test-automation-and-roi/</link>
		<comments>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/28/test-automation-and-roi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farid Vaswani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Measuring Test Automation ROI &#8211; in his post I.M.Testy has briefly touched on some aspects of test automation. &#160; Image Source &#160; I quite agree with his post and there are certain things that I would like to comment on and those are: I totally agree that &#8220;Automated software testing &#8216;is software development.&#8217;&#8221; and all [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/11/03/the-new-qa-process/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The New QA Process'>The New QA Process</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/10/04/direct-cost-of-test-driven-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Direct Cost of Test Driven Development'>Direct Cost of Test Driven Development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/20/compromising-user-acceptance-testing/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Compromising User Acceptance Testing'>Compromising User Acceptance Testing</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/28/test-automation-and-roi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behaviour-Driven Development</title>
		<link>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/25/behaviour-driven-development/</link>
		<comments>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/25/behaviour-driven-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farid Vaswani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behaviour-Driven Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test Driven Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am yet to work on a project where BDD &#8211; Behaviour-Driven Development framework is used. What is BDD? Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) is an evolution in the thinking behind TestDrivenDevelopment and AcceptanceTestDrivenPlanning. &#8230; It presents a framework of activity based on three core principles: Business and Technology should refer to the same system in the [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/10/04/direct-cost-of-test-driven-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Direct Cost of Test Driven Development'>Direct Cost of Test Driven Development</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/20/compromising-user-acceptance-testing/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Compromising User Acceptance Testing'>Compromising User Acceptance Testing</a></li>
<li><a href='http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/09/29/different-flavours-of-waterfall-and-agile-development/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Different Flavours of Waterfall and Agile Development'>Different Flavours of Waterfall and Agile Development</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://geek4eva.logicx.co.nz/blog/2009/08/25/behaviour-driven-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
